[address-policy-wg] unacceptable conduct and ad-hominem attacks

> On 19 Oct 2016, at 12:34, Ciprian Nica <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote:
> 
> But my problem at this point is not with an idea being right or wrong but with the fact that you are not a fair arbitrer.

In your (utterly flawed) opinion.

I’m fairly sure the overwhelming majority of the people of this list have absolute confidence in the integrity of the WG’s co-chairs. If you think you can do better, feel free to stand the next time the appointment process runs.

> As a WG Chair my opinion is that you should not take sides.

There is no evidence whatsoever to support your claim that Gert (or Sander) are “taking sides”.

> It's a simple question from a member of the community to one of the WG Chairs: did you abuse the last /8 or not ? Do you consider yourself a neutral arbitrer or not ? Do you consider yourself the one that should be judging others ?

Here’s a simple rhetorical question for you. Do you think making unjustified ad-hominem attacks and insults like the above will encourage support for your position on this policy proposal?

Your behaviour here is unacceptable and way, way, way out of line.

> Or is it your "job" to shut the voices that are not according to your interests ?

No. That’s *my* job. :-)

Until you apologise and learn how to conduct yourself properly on this list, Ciprian SHUT UP.