[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

> On 17 May 2016, at 14:44 , boggits <boggits at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 17 May 2016 at 13:08, Remco van Mook <remco.vanmook at gmail.com <mailto:remco.vanmook at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Let's hear your thoughts. I'll be at the RIPE meeting next week where I'll be talking about this proposal during the first APWG session.
> 
> So this includes LIR's who already have (through acquisition of other companies) multiple /22 from the last /8

It doesn't apply retroactively - so if you have already merged LIRs and are currently holding multiple /22s form the final /8 you're fine. It does stop future cases though.


Remco



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/41d0f54f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/41d0f54f/attachment.sig>