This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Tue May 17 14:44:16 CEST 2016
On 17 May 2016 at 13:08, Remco van Mook <remco.vanmook at gmail.com> wrote: > > Let's hear your thoughts. I'll be at the RIPE meeting next week where I'll > be talking about this proposal during the first APWG session. > So this includes LIR's who already have (through acquisition of other companies) multiple /22 from the last /8 That kinda sucks... In general I can see the point *but* please can we just stack the deckchairs neatly on the side and get into the boats... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/160344ce/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]