[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi Sander,

thank you for your answer


Il 12/05/2016 14:16, Sander Steffann ha scritto:
> Hi Riccardo,
>
>> Please explain how the current policy obtained a "success", luck? Why such policy was accepted and reached its consensum at that time?
> I can answer that one.
>
> For 2010-02 (https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2010-02) the WG started working down from one /8. Then the proposal started RIPE NCC had ±7540 LIRs. Using a /22 per LIR would allow for 16000 LIRs, so more than double the amount at the time. A /16 of address space was set aside for unforeseen circumstances, and the policy states that that reservation would become part of the main pool if not used for such unforeseen circumstances when the pool runs out.
My point here is that as when "last /8" was tought was to deploy IPv6 
and leave space to new entrants.
So objecting that 2015-05 will burn the free pool just because every LIR 
under /20 can request a /22 it's not point if wasn't the same in the 
past. We should attain at the historical datas to forecast or read an 
impact analisys about it.
 From approval of 2010-02 and 14 September 2012, when the policy was 
triggered, the number of LIRs grew from about 7540 to about 9000-10000. 
It would be able to forecast a grow of about 1500-2000 per year.
Leaving the oportunity to any old LIRs (that reiceved allocation from 18 
Jan 2011 up to 14/09/2012 under the old policy) to obtain a /22 after 14 
September 2012 would made everyone able to forecast not more 7000-9000 
/22 to new LIRs (LIRs after 09/2012)
Let me say another time there are many stranges big allocations made 
just two weeks before the new policy took place.

>
> I think Daniel's comment at the time sums it up quite nicely:
>> And we have to care about new LIRs, we need to reserve some address space for them - as lots of internet resources will be accessible only over IPv4 for long period after depletion. It's about survivance of free allocatable IPv4 address space as long as possible.

> 2011-03 (https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2011-03) updated the policy regarding returned address space. If I remember correctly the arguments on the list at the time were that by putting all the returned address space in the same pool as 185/8 it was made sure that we wouldn't end up in a policy limbo where it was not clear which policy applied to which IPv4 addresses.
Please note that the current text is:
[...]
This section only applies to address space that is returned to the RIPE 
NCC and that will not be returned to the IANA but re-issued by the RIPE 
NCC itself.
[...]

I am not able to fully understand this because I don't know what happens 
to returned address space and when not is handable by RIPE itself  and 
should be returned to IANA cleaned and issued back to RIR.

>
> Another good quote, Dave wrote about 2011-03:
>> And, frankly, we should take every opportunity remaining to expand the meagre pool of IPv4 addresses we leave to our children.
>
> And that's how we arrived at today's policy.
>
> Cheers,
> Sander
>
Thank you to all old LIRs that didn't request their last /22 so I had 
the oportunity to request for it early Jan/2015.
Anyway I strongly think the policy should go voer IPv4 and do something 
for IPv6!

regards
Riccardo

-- 

Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori at wirem.net
Mobile:  +39 339 8925947
Mobile:  +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943

WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info at wirem.net
         Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160512/f02bd84a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41774 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160512/f02bd84a/attachment.jpg>