[address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05

On 10 May 2016 at 16:17, Jérôme Nicolle <jerome at ceriz.fr> wrote:

> What's beeing sold is a service to ensure uniqueness and a well
> maintained registry. One-time fees won't cover that.
>

My bad, I should have said RIPE could "licence" or "mark as registered" the
/22 address block not "sell".

There is a recurring fee for PI space which I would assume would apply in
this case, and the company obtaining the /22 would also have to find a
sponsor LIR for their assignment.

But again, I'm not necessarily advocating this, just pointing out that
having a growing number of "fake" members, especially ones who do not share
in any way with the ideals and goals of RIPE, could be bad for RIPE as an
organisation in the long term.

Aled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160510/096e6715/attachment.html>