This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jérôme Nicolle
jerome at ceriz.fr
Tue May 10 17:17:00 CEST 2016
Hi Radu, Le 10/05/2016 16:40, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN a écrit : > For now, I have the impression that the administrative overhead is just > a pretext to be able to say "nonono, we DO NOT sell IPv4 addresses". IP adresses cannot be sold, it's public domain. What's beeing sold is a service to ensure uniqueness and a well maintained registry. One-time fees won't cover that. Whenever we decide to put a facial value onto adress blocks, we'd get in a slipery slope leading to the demise of innovation and competitive telecom market (re-read the taxi licence analogy). And it sure won't help to deploy IPv6 anyway, because incumbents will then be urged to slow its deployment in order to preserve their (now valued) advantage. Best regards, -- Jérôme Nicolle
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]