This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] agreement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue May 10 08:29:43 CEST 2016
> (note: my stance is based on forming a LIR simply to get any amount of > announcable addresses.) Hi, With a few drawbacks - more de-aggregation, (much) more complex policy - that could be achieved (without speeding up depletion). However, a lot of people let me understand that complexity is a no-go. That could even have been achieved with 2012-04 (rejected back in 2013). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]