This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fabio Zannicolò - Voix s.r.l.
fz at voixit.com
Mon May 9 12:37:56 CEST 2016
Hi, I would like to share with you my opinion on Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision proposal (2015-05). Today small companies have competitiveness problems due to lack of IPv4 resources. I consider unfair the current treatment, the big companies have stocks of IPv4 addresses. We need a balance between resource conservation and fair treatment, in addition to those already proposed my suggestions are: -allocations of a /22 every 18 months only from IPv4 Addresses Available Outside 185/8 to small LIRs (if LIR own < /20 of total allocations) -leave the current policy only for IPv4 Addresses Available in 185/8 to avoid the too fast depletion of resources -the addresses acquired with this system should not be able to be transferred for a long period of time to avoid profit Best regards, Fabio Zannicolò
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] agreement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]