[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:47 PM, NTX NOC <noc at ntx.ru> wrote:

> I oppose this proposal too.
>
> 1) it limits in rights all new LIRs. As I told in previous discussions
> LIR stats show the same rate of new LIR registration (250-300 LIRs avg)
> per month. It's about 40% of 185 is free and that means it will be about
> 7000 new LIRs in it. That will be enough for 2 years, and after RIPE has
> reseved space and reserve pool that could not be used for (as I remember
> 2 years) and another IPv4 space will be given to market.
> So there are enough space for 4-6 years with current situation.
>

False. This proposal does not change when space can be used.


>
> 2) RIPE here is not to limit abilities of the members to use IPv4
> space. RIPE should give opposites. ISPs will take care about all others.
> But in current case RIPE take part in business significant
>  parts and that's not good.
>

False. The proposal will not limit the abilities of the members to use IPv4
space.


>
> 3) Those policy add new fields and statuses to the database. And this is
> not good too. System should stay simple and useful. It's not good
> direction to make it more complex because there are a lot of question to
> current one system.
>

This is the only one of your objections that has some merit.
-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160618/878a0af3/attachment.html>