[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

> On 2016-06-17 21:09:21 CET, Remco van Mook wrote:
> Let me get this straight - you oppose a proposed change in policy because the change itself is not part of current policy?


I strongly oppose your proposal as it seeks to selectively strip Provider Aggregatable(PA) resource holders of their rights solely justified by your belief that this is how allocations allocated after the 14th September 2012 are supposed to be treated. If you are concerned about people selling off address space allocated after the 14th September 2012 for profit you can propose to change the holding period from two years to three or four years or even introduce a transfer fee like other Regional Internet Registries(RIRs) have in place. Such changes would be just and apply to all Provider Aggregatable(PA) allocations and not just to Provider Aggregatable(PA) allocations allocated after the 14th September 2012.

Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum