[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 21:09, Remco van Mook wrote:
> Let me get this straight - you oppose a proposed change in policy because
> the change itself is not part of current policy?

No, more people than you expected oppose it because you make an explicit
reference to allocation made after a certain date in the past:
<snip>
All allocations made by the RIPE NCC to LIRs after 14 September 2012
will be marked in the RIPE Database as “ALLOCATED FINAL”.
</snip>

Just remove "after 14 September 2012" and you ban all transfers. Not
necessarily a bad idea.
 
> Also, those "heavily disadvantaged members" as you describe them, only
> have received address space thanks to a particularly selfless decision by
> the community at the time to dedicate the last remaining address space to
> that purpose, rather than just blowing through it by early 2013.

Like in "we won't kill you with a bullet in the head, we will kill you
by letting you slowly bleed to death". Thanks.
Now you try to regulate how you are allowed (or not) to heal yourself.

--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
fr.ccs