[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi Stefan,

> On 17 Jun 2016, at 19:32 , Stefan Prager <contact at prager-it.com> wrote:
> 
> There is no mention in the Service Agreement that allocations provided after 14th September 2012 are to be treated differently than those handed out before the 15th September 2012. There is also no mention in the respective policies, as was mentioned during one of the talks at RIPE-72 in Denmark, that allocations received after the 14th September 2012 are to be used for the sole purpose of providing legacy connections to IPv4 networks.
> 
> Therefore it seems inconceivable that this proposal is allowed to go forward any longer than it already has as it would seek to single out already heavily disadvantaged members even more for the sole reason that they happen to be holding an allocation received after the 14th September 2012.


Let me get this straight - you oppose a proposed change in policy because the change itself is not part of current policy?

Also, those "heavily disadvantaged members" as you describe them, only have received address space thanks to a particularly selfless decision by the community at the time to dedicate the last remaining address space to that purpose, rather than just blowing through it by early 2013.


Remco
heavily disadvantaged member

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160617/8a9e8879/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160617/8a9e8879/attachment.sig>