This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Jun 13 12:47:06 CEST 2016
Arash Naderpour wrote: > Agree here with you, this is not appropriate to discuss how to > exploit the existing gaps here in APWG, I was just trying to explain > that technical difficulties are not the only reason IPv6 is not > deployed everywhere. It should be first be available and possible > (from legal point of view) to deploy it which is not yet in all > area. Arash, individually, people are probably sympathetic to the fact that companies and organisations in Iran are unable to deploy ipv6 for legal reasons. However, if the iranian government / regulatory authorities insist on shooting themselves in the foot by prohibiting ipv6, it's not the responsibility of the RIPE community to work around the damage that this causes. The IPv4 boat has sailed. It's now time to move on. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]