This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Jun 13 10:25:07 CEST 2016
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016, at 02:40, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > I don’t think the regulator is forbidding using a 6in4 tunnel because LI > regulation, otherwise, they will not allow any kind of VPN, etc? I don't think they do. But chasing 100 000 users running VPNs is not the same thing as chasing 10 ISPs providing VPN-like services (by default) to users.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]