This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
DI. Thomas Schallar
t.schallar at avalon.at
Thu Jun 9 14:46:09 CEST 2016
Hello Arash! Arash Naderpour schrieb am 09.06.2016 um 11:53: > Would be any new allocation for them in 1-3 years? No, of course not. > Re-allocate their IP space to what? Either to remaining IP fragments in older blocks or to CGN and/or IPv6. The very same what any provider has to do with its customers. As I asked before: how many ISPs do have more than one "final" /22 in Use? If this would be a small number, we can skip any discussion about them and what to do. regards, Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]