This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash_mpc at parsun.com
Thu Jun 9 11:53:55 CEST 2016
Hi, Re-allocate their IP space to what? Would be any new allocation for them in 1-3 years? Regards, Arash -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of DI. Thomas Schallar Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2016 4:54 PM To: Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy) Hi! Aleksey Bulgakov schrieb am 07.06.2016 um 15:22: > What will happen with already received additional /22 from the 185./8? My suggestion is, that the proposal should also apply for those LIRs. But of course you have to give them time to re-allocate their IP space, before they have to give the additional /22's back. I would think about 1-3 years. How many multiple last-/22 allocations do we talk about? 10? 1000? regards, Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]