[address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016, at 08:25, Gert Doering wrote:

> of grumbling and cursing here and there, but nobody decided to raise 
> a big stink in the AGM or ask their regulator to take over from the
> RIPE NCC".  Right?

Hi,

Wasn't this also because those that were unhappy did not have access to
the AGM ? 
I am aware of cases where "someones" lost pretty big chunks of PI (up to
/21) because they wanted way to much independence (including
independence from RIPE and RIPE NCC).... except they were too small and
were missing some local administrativia for the regulator to even read
their complaint. I do agree that those cases were a minority for the
whole service area, but there were cases where things were less clear
(e.g. dating back to a time where some of us were stuck to "NIR"s a.k.a
"last resort registries" which could do whatever they wanted).