This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Aug 5 08:25:10 CEST 2016
Hi, On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:29:59PM +0200, Sergey Myasoedov wrote: > > We (the RIPE community and the NCC) rolled out 2007-01 to all the > > other PI holders, and the amount of unhappiness was not very big. > > No. It was big. But you prefer not to mention that. That???s your > perception, please don???t say ???we???. "We" was related to "we rolled out 2007-01", and yes, that was "all of us". It might be that *you* were unhappy about it, but that's not the general sentiment I heard from other markets. > > Those cases that I was involved with my "LIR admin-c" hat on, PI holders > > seemed to be happy to have a clear contract with a known entity (us), and > > the assurance that this would ensure that nobody else could make claims > > to their address space. > > By the way, 2007-01 has produced a new market with ~2 MEUR/yr volume. > Do you really think that PI holders were happy to pay such amount? In this thread, you've seen statements from PI holders, clearly stating that they do not care at all for 50 EUR/year if they get clear contractual rights in return. As a network administrator, I do have my "own" /24 PI (... dating back to 1993 or so), and I also pay 50 EUR/year for it. I have considered whether that is enough of an annoyance to return it to the IPv4 pool, and decided that it has enough sentimental value for me to keep it. So yes, PI holders are OK with that. Note that I did not say "everybody was happy and celebrated". I said "the amount of unhappiness was not very big" - which translates to "a bit of grumbling and cursing here and there, but nobody decided to raise a big stink in the AGM or ask their regulator to take over from the RIPE NCC". Right? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160805/2d01252a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]