This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Wed Apr 20 12:50:27 CEST 2016
On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:53, Riccardo Gori wrote: > Andrea, can you help me understand what happened to available pool is > any when 185/8 was reiceved by IANA? I think this may be the wrong question. IIRC, the triggering of the "last /8" policy (as it has usually been known) did not coincide with receipt of 185/8 from (NB: not "by") IANA by RIPE NCC, but rather with the first allocation by RIPE NCC from 185/8. As Roger Jørgensen has explained, once the policy was triggered, it was to apply to all subsequent allocations. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]