[address-policy-wg] R: address-policy-wg

>It cannot be reiterated enough: The final /22 is a migration tool for IPv6. There is a large number of viable >solutions to use IPv6 as your main addressing scheme for a eyeball ISP, especially if you have started from >scratch only a few years ago.

> 

>Instead of screaming for more regulation on a market that more or less works, I think that focusing on IPv6 >adoption should be the first order of business.

> 

>Regards,

> 

>--ck

 

Who writes some sentence, surely knows that today IPv6 addressing in Italy is used only by Facebook, Google, Youtube and some other else, but most of sites are only reachable by IPv4.

So, please, let me know how to migrate all our customers to IPv6 giving them access to the whole internet, as today, and we’ll make it.

 

Vice versa I’m sure that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really needs them.

 

 

Da: Alessio Genova [mailto:alessiogenova1 at gmail.com] 
Inviato: giovedì 29 ottobre 2015 14:02
A: 'address-policy-wg at ripe.net'
Oggetto: address-policy-wg

 

Hello,

we are working as Wireless Internet Service Provider in Italy, and we became a LIR at the beginning of 2013, requesting  a /22.

>From 2013 to today our customers have grown up to more than 5000. Today every time Policy requests us a log about some fraudulent behavior made from one of our customer by internet, we have to give them a lot of logs (Gbytes of logs) because of we cannot associate public IP addresses to every our customer.

 

There are a lot of public IP addresses not used, and we are receiving a lot of proposals about selling IPs at 10€ / each .

I think that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really needs them.

 

Best Regards

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151029/8bff23b2/attachment.html>