This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] R: address-policy-wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz
jan at go6.si
Thu Oct 29 16:11:31 CET 2015
On 29/10/15 14:01, Alessio Genova wrote: > Hello, > > we are working as Wireless Internet Service Provider in Italy, and we > became a LIR at the beginning of 2013, requesting a /22. > > From 2013 to today our customers have grown up to more than 5000. Today > every time Policy requests us a log about some fraudulent behavior made > from one of our customer by internet, we have to give them a lot of logs > (Gbytes of logs) because of we cannot associate public IP addresses to > every our customer. Hey, It's a bit of a pain, is it? > > There are a lot of public IP addresses not used, and we are receiving a > lot of proposals about selling IPs at 10€ / each . > > I think that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or > should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really > needs them. We have been through this exercise numerous times already. Forget about it, IPv4 is over. Done. No more. Ex protocol. Use what you have, deploy IPv6 and try to figure out the figures if it's worth buying legacy numbers on the market. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] R: address-policy-wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]