This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg / Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg / Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Kunz
chrislist at de-punkt.de
Thu Oct 29 14:44:13 CET 2015
Hello, > There are a lot of public IP addresses not used, and we are receiving a > lot of proposals about selling IPs at 10€ / each . > > I think that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or > should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really > needs them. > > proposal appropriate and acceptable. > Also you need to put a brake to trade of the IPv4 networks It cannot be reiterated enough: The final /22 is a migration tool for IPv6. There is a large number of viable solutions to use IPv6 as your main addressing scheme for a eyeball ISP, especially if you have started from scratch only a few years ago. Instead of screaming for more regulation on a market that more or less works, I think that focusing on IPv6 adoption should be the first order of business. Regards, --ck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg / Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]