This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg / Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessio Genova
alessiogenova1 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 14:01:41 CET 2015
Hello, we are working as Wireless Internet Service Provider in Italy, and we became a LIR at the beginning of 2013, requesting a /22. >From 2013 to today our customers have grown up to more than 5000. Today every time Policy requests us a log about some fraudulent behavior made from one of our customer by internet, we have to give them a lot of logs (Gbytes of logs) because of we cannot associate public IP addresses to every our customer. There are a lot of public IP addresses not used, and we are receiving a lot of proposals about selling IPs at 10€ / each . I think that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really needs them. Best Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151029/c1439b37/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg / Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]