[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:44:00PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
>Besides, there's no RIR policy 

correct

>-- or reason to have one -- 

Isn't "provide an incentive to actually start deploying ipv6
services" a good enough reason? It is in my book.
It certainly provides a much better reward than having 4 or 5
stars on the RIPEness page.

>which doles out extra v4 allocations to LIRs who deploy v6. 

>If there's a compelling case to justify overturning current
>policy, it's not being made in 2015-05. I'm sure everyone here
>will be delighted to consider that case when someone presents a
>convincing argument which shows why the current policy is
>defective for the RIPE community as a whole. Over to you...

Please do not presume to speak for me or "everyone else" for that
matter.

Kind Regards,
Sascha Luck