[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

Hi.

>a. Arguments supporting the proposal
>Faster depletion of the free IPv4 pool may force the adoption of IPv6 on certain members.

But there is conflict with 2015-01, was accepted to prevent depletion
of the free IPv4 pool, wasn't it?

This case we have to create 2015-10 to cancel 2015-01, or change the
text of this one.


2015-10-20 17:01 GMT+03:00  <h.lu at anytimechinese.com>:
> Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them.
>
>> On 20 Oct 2015, at 2:52 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:16, h.lu at anytimechinese.com wrote:
>>> Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on
>>> the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would
>>> not support it.
>>
>> 5 years seems borderline even with existing policy.
>> Then, in about 3 years APNIC and LACNIC would have probbaly run out dry
>> (ARIN already did) and spill-over to RIPE area could be expected. Just
>> look at the existing us.* LIRs having only 185 v4 address-space.
>>
>> --
>> Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
>> fr.ccs
>



-- 
----------
Best regards,
Aleksey Bulgakov
Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29