[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them.

> On 20 Oct 2015, at 2:52 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:16, h.lu at anytimechinese.com wrote:
>> Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on
>> the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would
>> not support it.
> 
> 5 years seems borderline even with existing policy.
> Then, in about 3 years APNIC and LACNIC would have probbaly run out dry
> (ARIN already did) and spill-over to RIPE area could be expected. Just
> look at the existing us.* LIRs having only 185 v4 address-space.
> 
> --
> Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
> fr.ccs