[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

I agree it is a guess, but also should be an easy estimation(not very
accure one but rough one) if we taking burning rate of past 36 month into
account. I think NCC can clearify this future.

On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote:

> Hi James, Gert,
>
> On 10/20/15 4:06 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 02:02:38PM +0100, James Blessing wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 October 2015 at 13:46, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>      https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05
>>>>
>>> Can we limit it this to a /X to see what the impact is before throwing
>>> the entire remaining v4 space under a bus?
>>>
>> not a bad idea, I like it.
>
>> We're in discussion phase right now, so everything goes... :-) - this is
>> really the phase where a proposal test the waters to see if it is
>> generally
>> acceptable (potentially with minor corrections), needs larger surgery, or
>> is a total no-go...
>>
> let's collect the feedback and see if we need to come back with a second
> version.
>
>>
>> (As for the impact: I hope the NCC will nicely do the math for us how
>> many LIRs we currently have that would be eligible to receive "more space"
>> and what their crystall balls have to say on the subsequent run-out date
>> ;) )
>>
> Let's not forget that the crystal ball is just that... a guess. Nobody can
> predict how long will the free pool last.
> - I hope this also answers Lu's question/comment.
>
>> gert
>>
> cheers,
> elvis
>
>

-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151020/877b5174/attachment.html>