[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On 13.05.2015 11:43, Mick O Donovan wrote:
> Having listened to the rationale in person for this proposal I would
> give tentative support to this proposal on the basis that the request
> provides appropriate justification.

At this point I want to mention, that NCC-Staff is doing (and have
always been doing) a very good job reviewing requests for resources. And
although I was kind of p*ssed on one or another request back because of
not good enough formulated justification, I am happy that they did it.
Thanks for this!

For the ones asking for more conservation: I know a bunch of LIRs who
received a /29, as /29 currently does not need any justification. I also
know that those LIR will never ever use more than a /48 or /40 ... so if
we care that much about conservation now, I am sure that those few (we
are currently talking about 10 Requests and about 45 currently allocated
<= /28) requesters of larger V6-Space are nothing against the amount of
/29 assignments which will never be used.

Best regards
-- 
Jens Ott

Opteamax GmbH

Simrockstr. 4b
53619 Rheinbreitbach

Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
Email: jo at opteamax.de

HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989