[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote:
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> A proposed change to the RIPE Document "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" now is open for discussion.
> 
> The proposal aims to expand the criteria for evaluating initial IPv6 allocations larger than a /29. The RIPE NCC would consider additional aspects beyond only the number of existing users and extent of the organisation's infrastructure.  
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
> 	https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-03 
> 
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 27 May 2015.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
> 

Having listened to the rationale in person for this proposal I would
give tentative support to this proposal on the basis that the request
provides appropriate justification.

I also agree with Benedict's comment on the mic about ensuring that the
allocation is required to be so large by virtue of an address plan for
instance.

Regards,

Mick
-- 

Mick O'Donovan | Network Engineer | BT Ireland |
Website: http://www.btireland.net
Looking Glass: http://lg.as2110.net
Peering Record: http://as2110.peeringdb.com
AS-SET Macro: AS-BTIRE | ASN: 2110
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150513/6865807b/attachment.sig>