[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hi Jan,
>
> > I'd actually be interested to see a real life addressing plan that
> needed a /32 bit address space, where the need isn't constructed based on
> the mere possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few
> hundre million times of the entire IPv4 space.
>
> Giving significantly more than a single /64 to a single (home) user is
> part of the way IPv6 was designed. A /48 was a standard size from RFC 3177.
> It's successor RFC6177 is the current BCP. When working according to that
> BCP a /32 and even a /29 is really not that much.
>
> If you don't agree with an RFC/BCP then this is not the place to deal with
> that...
>

I'll be sure not to answer when asked the next time, thanks. :P
-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150511/c1f329b7/attachment.html>