[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On 11/05/2015 16:36, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
>> As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan
>> which needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be
>> interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit
>> address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere
>> possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre
>> million times of the entire IPv4 space. -- Jan
> 
> Since it's perfectly valid to ask for /48 per customer, with companies
> having tens of millions of customers, it's not a problem to motivate larger
> than /29.
> 
> The proposed change doesn't change this at all as far as I can tell.

this is already catered for in the existing policy, though.

Nick