[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:

> As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan 
> which needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be 
> interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit 
> address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere 
> possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre 
> million times of the entire IPv4 space. -- Jan

Since it's perfectly valid to ask for /48 per customer, with companies 
having tens of millions of customers, it's not a problem to motivate 
larger than /29.

The proposed change doesn't change this at all as far as I can tell.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se