This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Tue Jun 30 10:47:25 CEST 2015
Guten Tag, > Persomal attack! > > Let's talk substantially While I do not see a personal attack as such (just opposing your argument isn't a personal attack IMHO), let's stick to substantial: Being blacklisted isn't something that is out of an LIR's hands - when they get notified of a problem/abuse on the side of your customers, and they chose not to do anything about it, which in turn leads to blacklisting of not only a single IP but the LIRs *COMPLETE* /22 (which shows that most likely the problem isn't caused by a single IP), I'd say it's not a problem that either RIPE or the community has to solve ... and most certainly not a reason to oppose 2015-1 for ... Regards, Garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]