This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jun 29 22:53:40 CEST 2015
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:23:19PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
> One more argument.
>
> For example LIR has IPv4 185.100.104.0/22 and 185.100.116.0/22 (we talk that multi LIRs accounts don't abuse the system and LIR can have such IPs)
>
> But LIR's infrastructure needs to have /21. LIR can write to 185.100.108.0/22 owner and change his 185.100.116.0/22.
>
> But LIR has to wait for 24 months to do it if this proposal is approved.
There is nothing that you could do with a /21 that you could not do with
2x /22. Except, maybe, sell it off as a "single /21".
Next.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150629/868e3bd6/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]