[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs

Randy, I think the following bit, while true for final-/8 RIR pools, in
the large scheme is incorrect:

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 20:31 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> but, as there is no more, the need will not be fulfilled.

I'd say: Seller meets buyer at a mutually agreed upon transaction price.
The relative need two parties experience on one set of address space is
most easily expressed in monetary terms. The role of the RIRs going
forward in depleted-IPv4-land is to carry the public ledger.

However, any business plan relying on margin on transaction fees for
supply from RIR final-/8 is extremely shortsighted and the community
shouldn't give any concern for it since it is stupid in its limited
horizon and shortsightedness.

(One of the reasons I'd just like this to be all over now is so we can
skip this phase of destructive denial.)

/M