This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Jun 12 13:31:48 CEST 2015
> "ipv4 is gone and we need to get over it" maybe looks correct from a > point of view, but it does not for everyone in the community. there is no more. that is a fact. > What I'm trying to say is that IPv4 is the only option for a part of > community and they just cannot get over it. what you are saying is that the need continues. i agree. but, as there is no more, the need will not be fulfilled. > That part of community (mostly developing countries) are the one that > acting as the buyer and the IPv4 market exists when there is a need. the ipv4 market is not allocating more ip space, it is shuffling the existing space. most folk have gotten over their denial that this is, and will continue to be, the reality. > I try to read the discussion of the last/8 proposal, things are > changed and we may need to adapt to new conditions. yes, the new conditions are that we are acually in the last days. 32 bits is 32 bits and that's not gonna change. and C is gonna limit latency. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]