This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Fri Jun 12 10:00:35 CEST 2015
Hi If you want to put up a national firewall then you shouldn't allow v6 until that v6 version firewall is ready. China on the other hand has it's v6 firewall ready and at this time difficult to overcome at massive size( for v4 vpn can solve the problem) > 在 2015年6月12日,上午9:44,Aleksi Suhonen <ripe-ml-2015 at ssd.axu.tm> 写道: > > Hello, > >> On 06/12/2015 10:34 AM, Arash Naderpour wrote: >> In some countries (Like Iran) IPv6 deployments is not an option at the >> moment (or new future) as the regulatory and authorities do not allow to use >> it. > >> Developing countries with no IPv6 option have to use IPv4, the current >> policies forced them to become a buyer and that create a good IPv4 market. > > Honestly? Most developing countries are skipping IPv4 completely or as much as possible. If Iran has really banned IPv6 they deserve to pay themselves sick for IPv4. Furthermore, RIPE NCC does not have enough IPv4 addresses to give Iranians, even if we as a community wished for a special Iranian policy. > > -- > Aleksi Suhonen > > () ascii ribbon campaign > /\ support plain text e-mail >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]