This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Thu Jun 11 13:53:50 CEST 2015
Hi On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian at karotte.org> wrote: > * Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> [2015-06-11 13:03]: > > Hi > > > > I agree with you no more personal attack should happening any more. > > > > *And to be very clear, I am not attacking Gert personally.* > > Yes you do. You're questioning his integrity. > No, I am not questioning his integrity, I am questioning Chair of APWG's integrity, his integrity has nothing to do in this case, Chair of the APWG is not a person, it is a position in the community to moderate and manage the list. While I complaint about Chair of the APWG, why it has to become personal to Gert? > > *I am complaint about one of working group chair does not keep the level > of > > integrity as it should.* > > Gert is one of the few people I know that I trust completely regarding > integrity. He proved me right again by letting Sander conclude this > proposal so that neutrality is given. > I was not talking about his neutrality of this proposal. I was talking about my personal information and company info getting posted in the list while the Chair conclude it has relevance to the policy discussion. > > It is fundamental difference, in personal level, I do like to be friend > > with Gert and he of course feel free to like or dislike me. However as > APWG > > chair, I believe Chair should remain neutral on all ground but not > judging > > things based on personal preference as well as personal emotions. > > Noone can remain neutral on all grounds all the time. That is why he > is not "judging" anything in this case. Sander is. > No one can, personally, but while you are in a position, then you should. the person of you does not matter any more, rules apply to that position. > > > Let's not dive to far from what should be happening here, policy > discussion. > > Back at you. > > Sebastian > > -- > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > SCYTHE. > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > -- -- Kind regards. Lu This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150611/72691731/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]