This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Jun 10 15:05:59 CEST 2015
Sascha - On 10.06.2015 14:17, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >> RIPE is an open community of people and organisations who are >> interested in IP-based networking (and related matters), mostly >> in Europe and the Middle East. It does not have a legal >> identity. RIPE works by consensus. It does not vote. It does not >> have any formal membership structure and therefore does not have >> members in the same way that RIPE NCC has members. These things >> are deliberate. > > What is missing here is that the RIPE NCC, and its members, are bound by > the policies that RIPE comes up with. In reality, this > means that < 10 people on a mailing list (some of whom may or may > not be sockpuppets) decide how ~12,000 members have to deal with > the RIPE NCC. this is correct. As all and any of these ~12k RIPE NCC members - or rather their representatives as Local/Regional Internet Citizens - can influence the PDP process. If they do not wish to do so - that is also fine. But this would make any comment moot that the NCC members are not or cannot be heard. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]