[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published

Dear Vladimir,

On 09.06.2015 22:35, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
> So I think plain "+1" should not be also considered valuable.

please spare us all this kind of ridiculousness in your argument.

Thanks,

	-C.

>09.06.2015, 23:27, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:01:29PM +0000, Borhan Habibi wrote:
>>>  I oppose this proposal as it cannot solve thrpe problem
>>>
>>>  -1 to this proposal
>>
>> I find it quite interesting to see so many people show up today (on the
>> very last day of the review phase) that have never been seen on the APWG
>> list before, voicing "-1" without any more specific reasoning.
>>
>> Folks, we are not voting here. So it does not help to bring all your
>> friends to post a "-1". Come up with arguments.
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>         -- APWG chair
>> --
>> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>>
>> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
>> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> 
> -- 
> With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
> General director, QuickSoft LLC
> Tel: +7 903 1750503