This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Wed Jun 10 12:59:29 CEST 2015
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >While I do consider this only partially relevant to the policy >proposal under discussion, it *is* giving a background on what >is happening or has happened outside the last /8 range, and some >of these transfers indeed make the "30x /22 fast-transferred" >issue look fairly marginal. It is, however, not relevant to the 2015-01 discussion as that is solely about a loop-hole in the last /8 policy. Also it is used to impugn motives of participants and if that is ok now, I might have a thing or two to say as well... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]