[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:50:30AM +0200, Lu Heng wrote:
> Chair, do you agree with me? This is policy mailing list about policy and
> not about individuals or specific companies' activity. Please clarify this
> to the community because this is not the first time personally attack
> happening here(and not just to me and my company).

Actually I can't see a personal attack here.  I do see provable facts put 
on the table, which might reflect in a way that you might not like, but that 
is the usual problem with transparency.  All the data about, for example,
37.222.0.0/15 is available in the RIPE DB "--show-version <x>" output.

While I do consider this only partially relevant to the policy proposal
under discussion, it *is* giving a background on what is happening or
has happened outside the last /8 range, and some of these transfers indeed
make the "30x /22 fast-transferred" issue look fairly marginal.

(And please DO NOT top-post, quoting a full mailing list digest underneath
- *this* is something which might get the chair slightly angry)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150610/9a831a32/attachment.sig>