[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

> The new LIRs don't pay for a /22 from the last /8 either. They pay to
> become a LIR exactly as the older LIRs did. What do you mean?

I mean that LIRs before 2012 year didn't setup new accounts. They
could get new blocks so many as they wish in one LIR account. But
after this proposal will take place they will can sell their blocks.

>
>> Or let's change this proposal and continue the period for 48 months.
>
> Sorry I can't take this serious from a person who spams LIR contacts
> to sell the /22s he got by violating the intention of the last-/8
> policy. This proposal has to go trough as soon as possible. Further
> improvements can always be done in other proposals if the need arises.

Do you call the letter sending to email from the Transfer Listing
Service spam? For what is this service in this case?

>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
> 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
>             -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant



-- 
----------
Best regards,
Aleksey Bulgakov
Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29