[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

* Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> [2015-06-09 15:27]:
> Why do older LIRs have more priveledges than new ones? They didn't setup
> new accounts before 2012 didn't pay for each /22. I won't be call such
> names, but you will understand who are they if you open The transfer
> statistics.

The new LIRs don't pay for a /22 from the last /8 either. They pay to
become a LIR exactly as the older LIRs did. What do you mean?

> Or let's change this proposal and continue the period for 48 months.

Sorry I can't take this serious from a person who spams LIR contacts
to sell the /22s he got by violating the intention of the last-/8
policy. This proposal has to go trough as soon as possible. Further
improvements can always be done in other proposals if the need arises.

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 581 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150609/145d36be/attachment.sig>