[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

Don't tell then I did not warn :) 

When you will come to your senses and will start the multi LIR hole closing during 6 months, IPv4 will be exhausted

11.07.2015, 21:39, "Jan Ingvoldstad" <frettled at gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Petr Umelov <petr at fast-telecom.net> wrote:
>> Hello, WG.
>>
>> I understand you will approve this proposal in any case, you have made a decision in January and should comply with formalities.
>>
>> However I see many companies began to open multi LIR accounts and receive additional allocations.
>>
>> E.g.
>> netname: NL-PCXCOP-20150707
>> netname: NL-PCXMAD-20150707
>>
>> netname: DK-BORNFIBER5-20150709
>> netname: DK-BORNFIBER9-20150709
>>
>> netname: ES-RULZ2-20150710
>> netname: ES-RULZ3-20150710
>>
>> netname: ES-SUNNY2-20150710
>> netname: ES-SUNNY3-20150710
>>
>> Traders don't want to lose their profit and will begin to provide services to help open new accounts for the same company and companies will be do it by themselves.
>>
>> Thus IPv4 pool will be exhausted during 1-2 years.
>>
>> I understand the RIPE NCC dislike someone makes profit using RIPE's resources but we should not make emotional decisions.
>
> Absolutely, and therefore I suggest that since the above appears to be a big problem for you, that you write down a proposal that will handle this particular problem.
>
> Most people want to scratch their itch, and if you scratch it by writing a proposal, your itch can, perhaps, be scratched too.
>
> But if you don't write that proposal, nothing will happen, and maybe your worst fears will come true, through your own inaction.
>
> It's best that those who see a problem, are the ones to attempt addressing it.
> --
> Jan

-- 
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov