[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Petr Umelov <petr at fast-telecom.net> wrote:

> Hello, WG.
>
> I understand you will approve this proposal in any case, you have made a
> decision in January and should comply with formalities.
>
> However I see many companies began to open multi LIR accounts and receive
> additional allocations.
>
> E.g.
> netname: NL-PCXCOP-20150707
> netname: NL-PCXMAD-20150707
>
> netname: DK-BORNFIBER5-20150709
> netname: DK-BORNFIBER9-20150709
>
> netname: ES-RULZ2-20150710
> netname: ES-RULZ3-20150710
>
> netname: ES-SUNNY2-20150710
> netname: ES-SUNNY3-20150710
>
> Traders don't want to lose their profit and will begin to provide services
> to help open new accounts for the same company and companies will be do it
> by themselves.
>
> Thus IPv4 pool will be exhausted during 1-2 years.
>
> I understand the RIPE NCC dislike someone makes profit using RIPE's
> resources but we should not make emotional decisions.
>

Absolutely, and therefore I suggest that since the above appears to be a
big problem for you, that you write down a proposal that will handle this
particular problem.

Most people want to scratch their itch, and if you scratch it by writing a
proposal, your itch can, perhaps, be scratched too.

But if you don't write that proposal, nothing will happen, and maybe your
worst fears will come true, through your own inaction.

It's best that those who see a problem, are the ones to attempt addressing
it.
-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150711/8f67fbdb/attachment.html>