[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

Hi, WG.

What will we get if the proposal will take place without some changes.

Businesses will buy new blocks by means of M&A. They can find funds from other directions of their business and will be wait for 24 months and make transfer.

If we want really to close the hole, we have to make some changes - "The blocks allocated from the RIPE NCC and aren't used during 12 months should be returned to the RIPE NCC pool".

Otherwise the last /8 will be exhausted more quickly.

So I suggest to return this proposal to discussion phase.

02.07.2015, 09:41, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike at swm.pp.se>:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Staff wrote:
>
>>  3) The proposal should help market and companies to redistribute IPs
>>  from the companies who don't need them to companies who needs them.
>
> Thanks for writing a more structured list.
>
> However, the only thing of interest (to me) right now is to answer the
> question:
>
> "what harm would the proposed policy change do?", especially ones that
> hasn't been brought up.
>
> So please re-write your email with that in mind, and provide clear
> examples of what _harm_ the policy change would do to the actual companies
> that are going to USE the space (and their end users), not the ones
> trading in the address space.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se

-- 
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov