This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Jul 2 08:41:34 CEST 2015
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Staff wrote: > 3) The proposal should help market and companies to redistribute IPs > from the companies who don't need them to companies who needs them. Thanks for writing a more structured list. However, the only thing of interest (to me) right now is to answer the question: "what harm would the proposed policy change do?", especially ones that hasn't been brought up. So please re-write your email with that in mind, and provide clear examples of what _harm_ the policy change would do to the actual companies that are going to USE the space (and their end users), not the ones trading in the address space. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]