This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 01:21:18 CET 2015
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 23:44 +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Martin Millnert wrote: > > [...] > > > > This means that new entrants will have a method to at least receive > > > a /22 from the RIPE NCC for the foreseeable future. > > > > At the current burn-rate, 8 years. > > Does you calculation anticipate the scheduled allocations that will be made to > the RIPE NCC under the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation > Mechanisms by the IANA? It looks like March's allocation will deliver an extra > 512 /22s. No, simple stupid two point average line based on the numbers Elvis mentioned. But there's been additions during that time, too, I noticed in some graph. I bet Geoff can predict it better, modulo policy and behavioural changes. /M
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]