This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Sat Feb 21 00:44:28 CET 2015
Hi Martin, Martin Millnert wrote: [...] > > This means that new entrants will have a method to at least receive > > a /22 from the RIPE NCC for the foreseeable future. > > At the current burn-rate, 8 years. Does you calculation anticipate the scheduled allocations that will be made to the RIPE NCC under the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA? It looks like March's allocation will deliver an extra 512 /22s. Regards, Leo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5475 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150220/a616e6f2/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]